Blaine the Mono

Sunday, April 15, 2007

What Did You Think Would Happen?

The Syracuse Post-Standard reports on a recent meeting between Central New York farmers and Rep. Mike Arcuri (D-NY). Chief among the concerns raised by the farmers was the lack of available agricultural workers needed to work on the farms. The reasons for the labor shortages are simple: fear of arrest and deportation.

"Increased enforcement of immigration laws hit grape growers hard in 2006, said Tom Macinski, of Standing Stone Vineyards in Seneca County. The enforcement crackdown not only eliminated undocumented workers from the labor pool, he said, but also affected legal migrant workers.

They heard rumors about upcoming arrests," Macinski said. "They stayed away out of fear, even though their paperwork was entirely proper. . . . That made getting the grape crop in in 2006 much more difficult and also made it more expensive."

The call for tighter border restrictions and crackdown on illegal immigration comes primarily from conservative Republicans in the West and Southwest. The most notable proponent of tighter enforcement is Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-CO). Tancredo has launched a long-shot bid for the Republican Presidential nomination largely on a need to restrict the flow of illegal immigrants into the United States.

Agricultual workers are rational actors interested in pursuing their own self-interests. Therefore, when the costs of working in the United States (harrasment, arrest, and deportation) exceed the benefits (wages), the labor pool will begin to dry up. This is how the free market works.

In order to counter the labor shortages, there are two available options: reduce the immigration crackdown or increase wages for agricultural workers. If Tancredo and his supporters are serious about reducing illegal immigration, then they should level with the American people about the increased price of food and agricultural commodities that will follow.

2 Comments:

Blogger The sane one said...

Excellent point about illegal immigration.

I think it brings up a few interesting questions, most notably: Is cheap food worth it?

American policy has sacrificed everything for cheap food. Our rural communities are dying for jobs because a great number of farm jobs go to migrants. Is it worth having cheap food if we in effect take employment opportunities away from those who need to buy the food to begin with.

But for Republicans who are such fans of the free market (not you, but the south west anti-immigration crowd) my question is this: why is immigration the big exception to your free trade/free market agenda?

It seems to me that the "crack-down on illegals" crowd are disingenuous about their arguments because they are very reluctant to make legal immigration easier.

In the end, our laws that limit immigration by country were born out of late 19th century WASP fears of being overrun by Mics, WOPS, Polocks and Jews. It is time to have an honest discussion about what our immigration policies are, and what we actually hope to accomplish with them in the modern era.

April 16, 2007 at 9:27 AM  
Blogger Blaine the Mono said...

I think your last point about linking the immigration debate with an honest discussion about race relations is spot on.

Would we be having this crack-down on illegal immirgrants if they were mostly white Canadians, or Australians, or Brits? I think not.

If the purpose of immigration reform is to keep out the Other (in this case Mexicans), then be honest enough to state that as your policy goal.

April 16, 2007 at 3:48 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home