Boxer Forgets Her Target Audience
Someone needs to remind Senator Barbara Boxer that despite Democratic success in the midterm elections, the Congress is almost evenly divided. That means politicians need to take extra care not to alienate moderate voters.
The New York Times reports on the reaction to Sen. Boxer's grilling of Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice at yesterday's hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. But instead of the story being reported as the Senate coming out in strong opposition to President Bush's Iraq Policy, the story focused on what exactly Boxer meant when she pointed out that because Rice had no children, she would not have to make any sacrifices to support the President's plan.
Some Democratic Senate staffers complained privately that Ms. Boxer’s exchange with Ms. Rice allowed the Bush administration to turn the tables on Iraq critics and sidestep the larger issue of the almost uniform opposition to the president’s new plan to send an additional 21,500 U.S. soldiers to Iraq.The Democrats have shown themselves to be politically tone-deaf in the past, most recently with their over-the-top performance in the Confirmation Hearings of Judge Samuel Alito, in which the most reported-on moment was Mrs. Alito breaking down into tears from the accumulated assualt on her husband's character. The Democrats came across as bullies and Republicans such as South Carolina Senator Lindsay Graham scored points for "coming to the rescue" of Mrs. Alito.
The public has little stomach for political bullying, and the moderates didn't elect a Democrat Congress to beat down the Republicans through personal attacks. I don't know what Boxer had in her mind when she made her foolish statements about Rice, but she would be wise to confine future criticisms of the Iraq Policy to the Iraq Policy.

2 Comments:
You are, of course correct about Boxer going over-the-top. You are also correct that the Dems would do well to stick to the facts. There is certainly enough material.
I really want the Democrats to rise above the politics of personal destruction because the country needs it. But I understand where this exchange came from.
The Dems have spent the last six years being beaten about the head and shoulders by the administration and their surrogates. The GOP's style has been very caustic.
In short there have been a lot of hurt feelings because the Republicans have spent so much time stepping way the hell over the line.
This combined with the stonewalling, lying and incompotence of the Administration witnesses over the years has enraged the Democrats. When Dr. Rice looked to be giving the same old song and dance it was just more than she could stand.
What she said was over the line. The tactic is wrong for political discourse in the Senate. However, it kills me that there is such a double-standard when it comes to decorum.
I agree that there is a double standard, you have to look no further than Sean Hannity's newest feature the "Enemy of the State."
You can't make this shit up!
I think the problem is that right now the Dems are a majority coalition of pissed off liberals and frustrated moderates. Boxer is definitely in the pissed off liberal camp.
I think the moderates will put up with quite a lot of liberal venting as long as the Congress gets some accomplishments under its belt.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home